Showing posts with label Discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Discrimination. Show all posts

Vt. high court: Mom must pay child support

Saturday, October 14, 2006

ONLY A FEMALE CAN GET AWAY WITH THIS ONE, HASN'T PAID SUPPORT SINCE 1991, IF THIS WAS A FATHER HE WOULD HAVE BEEN THROW IN JAIL.. YET, THEY CLAIM THE CHILD SUPPORT ARE NOT BIAS AGAINST FATHERS.. WHAT A BUNCH OF SHIT..

By The Associated Press
10.13.06

ST. JOHNSBURY, Vt. — The state Supreme Court has ruled that a former Vermont resident must pay child support despite her religious beliefs.

In a split decision, the court said the state can revoke the driver's license of Joyce Stanzione, a member of Twelve Tribes Messianic Community in Arcadia, Fla., who has not paid child support since 1991.

Stanzione was ordered to pay $50 per week in child support when she and her husband divorced and he left the religious community to return to Vermont along with three of the couple's five children, according to court papers.

She never contested the order but made no payments, court papers said.

In 2002, Stanzione was ordered to pay $4,800 to the state to make up for the welfare payments Vermont taxpayers supplied her children while they lived with their father.

Stanzione again made no payments, and in 2003 the Office of Child Support successfully moved to have her driver's license suspended.

Stanzione, 54, appealed that order.

Her lawyer argued that as a member of Twelve Tribes, which has a community in Island Pond, Stanzione is not permitted to have an income under church law. Suspending her license because she has no income violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects religious freedom, said attorney Jean Swantko, who is also a member of the Twelve Tribes Community.

The Vermont suspension bars her from driving in Florida which prevents her from doing church work, Swantko said.

Three of five justices ruled in September that Stanzione is able to pay child support from her share of the Twelve Tribes' annual income.

They also said Stanzione did not show how the license suspension impinged on her religious freedom.

Associate Justice John Dooley dissented, saying her license should be restored.

The evidence "conclusively showed an inability to pay," Dooley wrote.

Twelve Tribes has some 25 settlements worldwide, including Island Pond, which was the site of a raid by the state of Vermont in 1984. State officials alleged the community was abusing its children, but a judge dismissed all charges for a lack of evidence.

Read more...

Child Support laws discriminate against fathers

Wednesday, September 6, 2006

Chipeur Advocates - News: "Child support laws discriminate against fathers, Montreal lawsuit claims
Federal Court in Montreal asked to strike down formula that violates Charter guarantee of equality and does not preserve child support for children
December 24, 2002 - MONTREAL - The federal government's Child Support Guidelines are biased against fathers and violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, claims a major lawsuit filed against the government in Federal Court yesterday.
The lawsuit, A.B. and G.H. v. Her Majesty the Queen, exposes the unfair formula that the Federal Government developed to determine child support payments - a formula that is not based on the true cost of raising children. The lawsuit shows how Canada's Child Support Guidelines mandate a massive transfer of wealth from men to women for no demonstrable purpose. The wealth transfer is not related to child support and could only be described as extra alimony. But the lawsuit asserts that the federal government cannot use the child support rules to pad alimony payments.
The lawsuit also challenges the rules that remove paying parents - usually fathers - from any financial decision-making for the children. By doing so, the Child Support Guidelines interfere with the parent-child relationship.
The statement of claim highlights at least seven significant flaws in the current Divorce Act:
1. It arbitrarily requires men (in 90% of the cases) to make payments to their former spouses, using a formula that is not based on the needs of the children - this violates the Charter;
2. It does not require the child support payments to be accounted for or in fact spent on the children - this deprives children of financial security;
3. It establishes a new tax, a tax on being divorced and a father � and directs the tax revenues to a former spouse, not the children;
4. It v"

Read more...

Current Posts

Recent Posts

  © Blogger template Writer's Blog by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP