This Cow Ann Heche get a pass on month of child.

Saturday, May 17, 2008


"My recurring business expenditures, household expenditures and support payments have nearly exhausted my financial resources...I am continuing to look for work but I have no offers pending and the impending strike by the Screen Actors Guild reduces my prospects for work even further."


Men in Trees has gone the way of the dodo. Unfortunately, Anne Heche's cash supply seems to be nearing extinction, as well.

After Heche claimed she'll be more than $6,000 in the hole if she's required to shell out any more money, a judge on Wednesday granted the actress' request to suspend child and spousal support payments to ex-husband Coley Laffoon for the month of July, according to court documents obtained by E! News. (View the docs.)



If it was the Husband the judge would have said NO Way, Pay or go to Jail.

I wonder what she did to get this order. I bet there was some knee work involve


This the Judge who allow this to happen. Would she done the same for a Father who fell on hard time. Hell No she wouldn't, Just goes to show that Men are the only one force to pay support even if they can't afford it, and mother don't have to, nor will be force too.

Every father in LA should call her and complain about her bias towards fathers.

This is a good quote

Strange...the courts don't take your financial situation into account when you are a MAN!!!! You have to pay even if it means you end up living in a refrigerator box under an overpass!!! Why is she getting special treatment?? Because she's a WOMAN??? I thought we were all equal now... This is b******t!


Judicial Officers · Permanent Assignments

Sort by: Department | Last Name

NameTitleLocationDept.Phone
FEUER, GAIL R JudgeStanley Mosk Courthouse67(213) 974-4331

Read more...

What,Where and How

Read more...

Bill would lengthen child support payments

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

COLUMBIA, S.C. - Parents could be on the hook for child-support payments past their child's 18th birthday under a bill to be considered today in a Senate subcommittee.

That could cost a noncustodial parent an extra $3,000 if he or she was forced to pay an additional year of child support. But it would also ensure students who started school later than their peers would not have their financial support yanked while they were still in high school.

The bill says that if a child is still in high school, the parent would have to make child-support payments until the child graduated or until the youth turned 19, whichever occurred later.

The changes were proposed at the urging of South Carolina Department of Social Services officials who were beginning to see signs that more and more students were getting caught in a gap between their 18th birthday and graduation day.

"If you had a child whose birthday was in October and they turn 18 in their senior year, they are without child support for about 9 months," said Larry McKeown, director of DSS division of child support enforcement.

"This levels the playing field. There is nothing magical in the 18th birthday. The magic is in paying child support until they finish school as long as your child is making satisfactory progress," McKeown said.

Since 2003 the amount of child-support payments paid to parents caring for children has crept up steadily from $244 million to $254 million last fiscal year. The number of cases stayed about the same, while the collection amounts increased from $239 to $256 per month, according to DSS data.

The House approved the bill in February.

Read more...

Federal rebates check

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) - Many Wisconsinites will be getting long-promised federal tax rebates soon, but some of those payments are being diverted.

The state Department of Workforce Development says all or part of the economic stimulus payments to more than 171,000 people in Wisconsin will be intercepted because they're behind in child support payments.

Read more...

the federal Bradley Amendment

Saturday, April 26, 2008

the federal Bradley Amendment for child support is unconstitutional:
1. violation of due process under the 4th and 5th Amendments
2. deprival of equal protection under the law
3. violation of state sovereignty under the 10th Amendment
4. violation of natural human rights under the 9th Amendment

Write your Congress and Senate to repeal Bradley!

and more details at http://bradleyamendment.wordpress.com



Read more...

Current Posts

Recent Posts

  © Blogger template Writer's Blog by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP